《火箭联盟》国服疑似被腾讯拿下 总销量破千
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 hours ago | comment | added | Questor | I suppose you change the this response to an I-message instead. "When I receive an email written by an LLM instead of a human, I feel like my work and time are not appreciated, and I have difficulty understanding it. I would like you to write this email instead of using an LLM, as I cannot tell what parts of this email are true, and what are AI hallucinations." | |
| 12 hours ago | comment | added | Nuclear Hoagie | I think this is a good approach, but it does assume that you can tell the difference between AI- and human-generated text with virtually no false positives (which seems reasonable in this case with blocks of AI text under an intro line). But be careful - it'd be poorly perceived to send this to someone who did not, in fact, use AI. | |
| 14 hours ago | comment | added | hlovdal | marketoonist.com/2023/03/ai-written-ai-read.html (from this answer). | |
| 15 hours ago | comment | added | Fildor | @LukeSawczak It also looks like diverting responsibility. Let's say OP missed a question in that wall of text. -> "But OP reviewed it and gave thumbs-up"... (yep, been there) | |
| 15 hours ago | comment | added | Fildor | ^^ I second NotThatGuy. I also wouldn't be interested in a prompt. As a tech, I'd expect questions in an ordered list, so I can quickly identify and answer them. And that's what I'd communicate back. I'd also make the tone professional but "don't waste my time again"-ish. That's what I take the answer to be basically (ignoring details). | |
| 21 hours ago | comment | added | NotThatGuy | There's a non-trivial chance that they've been having a longer chat with an AI, and their final prompt was just something like "please write an email to Cloud summarising this" (if not something more like "emel 2 cloud"), in which case they can't really just give you the prompt. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Anketam | This can be very confrontational and in some work cultures be considered insubordinate. I would advise caution or softening the wording on such an email like this. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Luke Sawczak | Not bad. I mean, if they didn't know this, that the information was unreliable and unfit to send out, they wouldn't ask OP to review it. Sending it to OP is clearly just piling the snow on a neighbour's driveway. It's appropriate to point out that this is unproductive and unappreciated. | |
| yesterday | history | answered | Questor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |